Brian Devine handed two-year ban over ‘Clicky Ponting’ finger-clicking scandal
English club cricketer Brian Devine has received a two-year suspension after being found to have used finger-clicking sounds to imitate the noise of a ball edging a bat. The unusual deception, dubbed the “Clicky Ponting” scandal, has drawn attention well beyond local league cricket, raising questions about sportsmanship, umpiring and how disciplinary bodies handle misconduct at grassroots level.
Devine was playing for Saltburn’s second XI in the North Yorkshire and South Durham League when the incident came to light. According to reports, he clicked his fingers as the ball passed the batter, creating a sound that could be mistaken for contact with the bat. Fielders then appealed for a catch behind, putting the umpire under pressure to make a decision without clear evidence of an edge.
The England and Wales Cricket Board (ECB) has banned Devine from cricket under its jurisdiction from September 30, 2026, to September 29, 2028. The suspension covers more than playing: he is also barred from coaching, umpiring, scoring and managing junior teams during that period.
How the alleged deception worked
In cricket, a faint edge can be difficult to hear, particularly in a recreational match without specialist technology or a large officiating team. Umpires often rely on what they see and hear, alongside appeals from the fielding side. The reported finger-clicking tactic exploited that split-second uncertainty by supplying a misleading sound at precisely the moment a batter might have nicked the ball.
The controversy first surfaced in July 2026, when Devine was reportedly heard making the sound while fielding in the slips. The position is close to the wicketkeeper and batters, making it a plausible location from which to imitate a faint edge. The later case involving Saltburn’s second XI prompted further scrutiny and led to formal disciplinary action.
The nickname “Clicky Ponting” refers to former Australia captain Ricky Ponting, who was famously associated with sharp slip catching. In this case, however, the label has become shorthand for an alleged attempt to manufacture the impression of a catch rather than take one.
Saltburn sanctioned despite suspending the player
Saltburn Cricket Club said it had suspended Devine and made clear that he would not represent the club again. The club also participated in the disciplinary process and accepted the appeal decision following an earlier ruling by the league.
Even though Saltburn acted against the player, the club has faced consequences of its own. Its second XI has been relegated to Division Three, and Saltburn will begin the 2027 season with a 60-point deduction. The ruling also means Middlesbrough Cricket Club’s second team avoids relegation.
In a statement, Saltburn said it had fully engaged with the proceedings and was now turning its attention to preparations for the next season. The penalties underline a wider principle in organised sport: disciplinary bodies may consider not only an individual’s conduct, but also a club’s responsibilities for maintaining standards and responding to serious allegations.
Rival players say concerns extended beyond one match
The allegations prompted criticism from opponents, some of whom claimed the clicking had affected matches involving other clubs. One rival player, quoted by The Sun, said the sound appeared to have been used across multiple games. The player also claimed that, after Devine was exposed and the clicking stopped, the number of resulting dismissals fell away.
Another opponent described a match in which three batters were given out caught behind, despite each reportedly insisting they had not touched the ball. Such accounts are allegations from rival players rather than independent proof of every disputed dismissal, but they help explain why the case generated such strong reactions in the local cricket community.
Television presenter Piers Morgan also commented publicly after the story emerged, calling the episode “unbelievable” and describing Devine as “the biggest cheat in cricket history.” His remarks helped propel a local league disciplinary case into wider public discussion, although the formal sporting consequences were determined through cricket’s disciplinary process.
Why the case matters for grassroots cricket
Unlike elite international matches, club fixtures generally do not have multiple officials, stump microphones or video review. Umpires may be volunteers, and they must make decisions quickly while managing appeals from both teams. That makes trust and fair play especially important: a deliberate attempt to influence an official can undermine confidence not only in one dismissal but in the match as a whole.
The case also highlights the challenges of investigating misconduct in amateur sport. A sound can be difficult to attribute, and a disputed decision does not automatically establish that an umpire was deliberately misled. League and governing-body proceedings therefore need to weigh testimony, match circumstances and any available evidence before imposing sanctions.
For clubs, the episode is a reminder to establish clear reporting procedures and support officials who raise concerns. It also shows that consequences can extend beyond the person accused, affecting team standings, future seasons and the reputation of an entire club.
What happens next?
Devine’s ban is scheduled to run until September 29, 2028, preventing him from taking part in a broad range of cricket activities under the ECB’s authority. Saltburn, meanwhile, faces the task of rebuilding its second XI after relegation and a substantial points penalty.
The “Clicky Ponting” affair is an extraordinary story, but its wider lesson is familiar across sport: competitive pressure cannot justify manipulating the officials responsible for applying the rules. The disciplinary outcome may deter similar behaviour, while the league’s prediction for the coming seasons will depend on whether players, clubs and umpires can restore confidence in the fairness of local cricket.


